« 4/27/10 QUADRUPLE FEATURE: Wind Developer a-comin'! It's Open Season on rural Wisconsin communities AND Help a Wind Developer Out: Chicago-based Invenergy Goliath may get back up from legislature in its fight against one rural Wisconsin family AND The Wirtz Family Story for those who missed it AND Lets look at a wind tower 'tilt up' -- wait, how big is that thing again? | Main | 4/24/10 DOUBLE FEATURE: How many Wind Siting Council Members have financial ties to wind? What's the problem? AND Take a look at who is on the council to see why there is concern. »

4/25/10 DOUBLE FEATURE! Invenergy Goliath still swinging at rural Brown County AND What a wind developer will do for you if turbine noise and shadow flicker are are problem.

Battle over proposed Brown County wind farms continues

SOURCE Green Bay Press-Gazette, www.greenbaypressgazette.com

April 25 2010

By Tony Walter, 

The fight over whether Brown County should be home to Wisconsin’s largest wind farm continues as state regulators debate rules over such energy-producing facilities.

“Our purpose is to give our towns a voice,” said Steve Deslauriers, who lives in the town of Holland. He also is a member of the Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy, a volunteer group fighting the proposed widespread installation of turbines in the towns of Morrison, Wrightstown, Glenmore and Holland.

Kevin Parzyck is the development manager for the Ledge Wind Energy Project, a 100-wind turbine farm proposed by Chicago-based Invenergy. He said the company isn’t remaining idle as it waits for Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission’s decision on guidelines over where wind turbines can be located and what kind of impact they can have on residents and property.

“We continue to work closely with dedicated landowner groups and building relationships with county and town officials,” Parzyck said. “Clear minds will see this project and its benefits.”

Invenergy wants to build the first major commercial wind farm in Brown County and the largest in the state. It has signed contracts for about $8,000 a year with numerous property owners permitting 400-foot turbines on their property.

Many property owners and residents in the southern Brown County communities have spoken out against the project, citing negative health effects and the potential loss in property values.

The PSC has the authority to approve or reject Invenergy’s application and has formed a wind siting council to draft proposed guidelines over such operations.

The council has met several times, most recently Thursday, and is expected to make its recommendations to the PSC this spring. The public would then have time to comment on the rules before a final decision is made.

Invenergy will resubmit its application based on the state’s rules, Parzyck said.

The group fighting the wind farm in Brown County has registered with the state so it can participate in the PSC process.

The Green Bay Area Chamber of Commerce has also entered the wind farm discussion. The chamber’s Public Policy Committee recently met with the opposing sides and will meet again May 21 to decide if it wants to take a side and make a recommendation to the chamber board.

“We’ll probably take a position,” said Chamber President Paul Jadin. He said the board might decide to back efforts to have the county’s health department study health and safety effects of wind turbines, or it might weigh in on whether the state should subsidize wind energy.

More than half of the proposed wind turbines would be installed in Morrison, where the Town Board has tabled the issue until the PSC publishes its siting rules.

Invenergy officials say wind energy has an economic benefit for the public.

“There has been a great deal of static created by fear stirred up by the opposition that has a variety of agendas they’re trying to fulfill,” Parzyck said. “No doubt there are some in the group with an agenda to stop wind energy altogether in the state of Wisconsin and flies in the face of the goals of the governor and Legislature.”

The goals, according to Deslauriers, are protecting health, safety and financial well-being of landowners.

“The state is taking the voice away from the towns,” he said. “We also have a big concern about well contamination out here because of questionable use practices on our land.”

NOTE FROM THE BPWI RESEARCH NERD: What will a wind developer or wind company do for you if turbine noise and shadow flicker are a problem after the turbines are up? The complaint and 'solution' outlined in this letter from a wind project resident to the North Dakota Public Service Commission are nearly identical to wind project residents in Wisconsin.



TO: Jerry Lien
North Dakota Public Service Commission
April 16, 2010

Greetings Jerry,

I appreciate your attention to this matter of the effects of living next to wind turbines. As was discussed in our phone conversation, Next Era Energy is not offering to repair the damage or fix the problem of the noise and shadow flicker imposed on our home, business and property. They merely want to pay us to accept it.

They say we can use the payment to fix the problem ourselves. In order to receive the payment, we must accept this contract as offered, which I have attached to this letter [below]. This contract, as you can see, is a release for the company to negatively affect us. Furthermore, this contract has more wording in it about keeping quiet about the whole issue than solving the problem. Also you can see that it will be binding on us and our property in any future issues.

$15,000 as a payment is not going to fix this problem. We did not ask for money from this company but requested a relief to the problem at hand. Scott Scovill from Next Era, suggested for us to buy trees with the money.

Trees will not block the effects because they are not tall enough and may take up to twenty years before they would grow even fifty ft. tall. One solution we suggested was to turn the offending turbines off only during the time they cause shadows. That suggestion was answered by Scott bluntly saying “we’re not shutting them off”. Since then Scott or any other Next Era representative has not returned our phone calls.

Mary Ann and I cannot sign on to a contract of this nature. Our attorney advises against it as well. We are not willing to release to the company our property and enjoyment of our home so they can cause noise, shadow flicker, interference, diminishment of property value and the effects acknowledged in their contracts. We are now suffering from these problems as a result of the decision to allow this irresponsible siting of wind towers too close to our farm.

By reviewing the project you can see there are about four or five turbines to the east of our farm that are causing blinking shadows up to and hour and a half per day for at least 12 weeks of the year. The shadow effects across the windows of our offices are severely disruptive to our business.

How does the Public Service Commission plan to deal with our issue? Is this going to be allowed in every wind farm project in the future? Is it going to be allowed that a large out-of-state company negatively impact a local business? Are the residents of this state expected to sell – (quoted from the contract) “the ability to use or enjoy your property, nuisance, injury or harm to persons, anxiety, suffering, mental anguish and loss of ability to enjoy life”?

I would like a response to these questions.

It has been brought to my attention that Next Era representatives have been spreading a lie that we knew this wind farm project was planned before we purchased our property here in Griggs County. This is a false statement and can be proven. We were living on our farm when we were invited to the first meeting of this project.

I request that you make this contract and my letter part of the public record.

Jim Miller

[[[[ ]]]]


THIS RELEASE (“Release”) is made as of the _____ day of _____________, 2010 by and between Ashtabula Wind II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Company”) and __________________________________, (“Owner”) (hereinafter collectively the “Parties”) upon the terms and conditions set forth below:


WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of a certain tract of land located in Griggs County, North Dakota legally described on the attached Exhibit A (“Property”) and incorporated herein; and

WHEREAS, Company owns and operates the Ashtabula Wind Energy Center (“Wind Farm”), a wind farm which is adjacent to the Property; and

WHEREAS, Owner notified Company that they are experiencing problems with shadow flicker at their residence on the Property.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set forth herein, the Parties hereby agree, as follows:

The recitals are true and correct and are incorporated in this Release by reference.

Company shall pay to Owner the one-time amount of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00), payable on or before March 31, 2010, for any and all shadow flicker related to the Property, caused or alleged to be caused by the Wind Farm stemming from, related to or attendant to the operation of the Wind Farm by Company, its parent companies, affiliates, successors, assigns, related companies including but not limited to interference with glare, shadow flicker, diminishment of the value of the Property, the ability to use or enjoy the Property, nuisance, and any injury or harm to persons, including but not limited to anxiety, suffering, mental anguish, loss of the ability to enjoy life, or any other harm or wrong, tort, intentional or negligent conduct stemming from, related to or consequent to shadow flicker from the Wind Farm whether claimed or not claimed, including all claims that could have been brought, or which hereafter might be brought by Owner or any of their successors and assigns.

The matters settled and released pursuant to this Release include all matters, claims, causes of action, and disputes of any nature whatsoever within the authority of the Parties (including third-party claims, indemnity claims, contribution claims, direct and derivative claims, and any other claims held in any capacity) whether or not fully accrued, relating to or arising out of the interference on the Property. The foregoing matters described in paragraph 2 are referred to hereinafter in this Release as the “Released Matters.”

The Parties, each for itself and its directors, officers, agents, and/or representatives, hereby expressly and unconditionally release and discharge one another, and their respective directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, agents, successors and/or assigns, from any and all obligation, liability or responsibility arising from or as a result of the Released Matters.

The execution of this Release shall not be construed as an admission by any Party as to the validity or invalidity of any other Party’s position with reference to the issues resolved in this Release and neither party shall, directly or indirectly, seek to take or advance any position before any court, agency, or administrative tribunal, predicated in whole or in part on any term or condition of this Release except in connection with an action to enforce this Release or the terms or conditions thereof.

The fact of settlement, the amount, nature of terms of the Release, and this Release are to are to remain strictly, totally and completely confidential and any breach of the terms of this Release shall entitle the non-breaching Party to seek all equitable relief as well as monetary damages from Owner.

The Parties agree not to make any statements, written or verbal, or cause or encourage others to make any statements, written or verbal, that defame, disparage or in any way criticize the personal or business reputation, practices, or conduct of the other party, its employees, directors, and officers.

The Parties acknowledge and agree that this prohibition extends to statements, written or verbal, made to anyone, including but not limited to, the news media, investors, potential investors, any board of directors or advisory board or directors, industry analysts, competitors, strategic partners, vendors, employees (past and present), and clients. Either Party, if approached, has the right to state “we had an issue and that the issue has been resolved to our satisfaction.

The Release may not be modified or amended except by a written instrument signed by all the Parties hereto.

In the event of litigation arising out of or in connection with the enforcement of this Release or any dispute arising out of this Release, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and incidental expenses incurred in connection with such litigation proceeding, including all costs or fees incurred on appeal.

The provisions of this Release shall be governed by North Dakota law.

8. This Release shall be binding upon the predecessors, heirs, successors, and assigns of each Party.

EXECUTED on the dates appearing below their signatures by the Parties’ undersigned officers, duly authorized.

Ashtabula Wind II LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: ________________________________________
Name: Dean R. Gosselin, Vice President
Date: ________________________________________

Owner: ________________________________________
Name: ________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________

Posted on Sunday, April 25, 2010 at 09:19AM by Registered CommenterThe BPRC Research Nerd | Comments Off

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend