« 12/20/10 Radio Radio: Listen to wind rules discussed on WORT'S 'A Public Affair' AND! This Just In: Yet another letter from legislators to Senator Plale asking him to object to the wind rules BUT Is there a mailbox in his spider hole? | Main | 12/10/10 Watch the PSC weaken the wind siting rules by clicking on the image below AND a letter from Rep. Bies regarding news rules AND Madison Knows Best: PSC's new rules deliver a multi-million dollar candy-gram to wind developers and a stinging slap in the face to rural Badgers »

12/16/10 UPDATE!!!! FOUR COMMITTEE MEMBERS OFFICIALLY REQUEST PLALE TO OBJECT TO RULES! But Where in the world is Senator Plale? Not returning calls, not responding to pleas for objection to the wind rules. All I want for Christmas is an official objection to the PSC's wind rules: Representatives Ott and Zigmunt explain why, and so do the good citizens of Brown County

WHERE OH WHERE HAS SENATOR JEFF PLALE GONE?

IS THERE A SPIDER HOLE IN MADISON?

With the clock running out on objecting to the wind rules, Senator Plale seems to have gone into hiding.

An aide to other senate committee members responsible for approving the wind rules say Plale has "checked out" and is no longer returning phone calls or any other manner of request for objection to the PSC's weakened wind rules.

Those of us who have been following this issue apparently must now begin to beat the bushes, pound on doors and look for spider holes in Madison and Green Bay in order to find the senator who holds the fate of so many of us in his hands.

 Letter from Representative Al Ott

To Representative Jim Soletski
Chairman, Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities

To Senator Jeff Plale
Chairman, Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail

December 10. 2010

Chairmen Soletski and Plale:

I would like to take this opportunity to respectfully request your consideration in promptly scheduling an Executive Session of your respective Committees in order to object to Clearinghouse Rule 10-057.

Upon review of the changes made by the Public Service Commission (PSC) to Clearing House Ril 10-057, it is clear the Commission did virtually nothing to address the serious concerns raised by the numerous citizens who testified before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail in October.

I sincerely appreciate that the Senate Committee did the right and responsible thing by holding a Public Hearing and ultimately sending the rule back to the PSC for modifications.

I also appreciate that the PSC did make some improvements to the rule; however, I find it unfortunate that the PSC seemingly chose not to listen to the vast majority of concerns brought forward during the October 13th hearing.

Further, I would argue that the modified setback provision s relative to occupied community buildings and non-participating residences show a blatant disregard for the citizens of areas targeted for wind farm developments.

This is an issue that will impact people's lives and is not to be taken lightly. I believe it is absolutely necessary for your respective Committees to utilize the legislative oversight authority proved by law to ensure that the people who stand ot be impacted the most by the siting of wind turbines are afforded every opportunity under the administrative rule process to protect their rights and their communities.

The process for developing this rule has been flawed from the start. I ask that you bring that flawed process to a halt by objecting to Clearinghouse Rule 10-057 prior to December 22, 2010 so that it may be taken up by the Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules.

Thank you for your consideration of my request. I look forward to your response.

SIncerely,

Al Ott
State Representative
3rd Assembly District

LETTER FROM REPRESENTATIVE ZIGMUNT:

December 16 , 2010

The Honorable Jim Soletski

Chairman, Assembly Committee on Energy & Utilities

307 West, State Capitol

Madison, WI   53702

The Honorable Jeff Plale, Senate Chairperson

Chairman, Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail

State Capitol, Room 313 South

Madison, WI 53702

 

Honorable Chairmen Soletski and Plale,

 I take this opportunity to respectfully request a public hearing on Public Service Commission Clearinghouse Rule 10-057.

My office has received numerous contacts from my constituents requesting this hearing before the rule goes into effect. Concerns have been raised over health and environmental impacts that could stem from the wind turbines and my constituents feel these concerns have not been properly addressed.. As such, I consider it necessary that the people be given the opportunity to make their case regarding this ruling directly to the legislature.

Thank you for your serious consideration of my request.

Sincerely

Ted Zigmunt

State Representative

2nd Assembly District

 

PRESS RELEASE FROM BROWN COUNTY CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE RENEWABLE ENERGY

BCCRWE says PSC Action is “Dirty Politics”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 13, 2010

(Denmark, WI) Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy says the latest maneuver by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin regarding wind turbine siting rules is the embodiment of "dirty politics."

The three PSC Commissioners, Eric Callisto, Lauren Azar, and Mark Meyer, voted unanimously on December 9, 2010 to send updated wind turbine siting rules back to the legislature.

These updated rules were crafted after the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail sent the rules back to the PSC for changes following an October 13, 2010 public hearing in Madison, WI.

The intent of the Senate committee that returned the rules to the PSC was summarized by Senator Jon Erpenbach in a November 30, 2010 letter to the PSC (letter below).

We are thankful that Senator Erpenbach called for larger setbacks to residences, lower noise levels, and setbacks measured from property lines. Perhaps most important, was his request for further study of the health impacts to people living in close proximity to industrial wind turbines. The PSC acknowledged receipt of his letter, and then blatantly ignored most of Senator Erpenbach's key requests.

The PSC rule changes reduce the setback requirement for large turbines (a reduction of 300 feet for turbines the size of those recently erected in the Town of Glenmore), and significantly reduce payments to non-participating neighboring landowners.

While that alone is disturbing, more so is the timing for the submission of the rules.

The PSC chose to submit the rules during the last month of a lame duck legislature; at a time when offices are being vacated in Madison, staff is moving, and legislators are preparing for the holidays. In the midst of all this change, legislators who are members of the House and Senate energy committees have only 10 working days to study and fully understand the changes the PSC made.

They can express their opinion on the new rules, but only the Committee Chairmen (Senator Plale or Representative Soletski) can formally 'object' to them. We were thankful that Senator Plale called for a public hearing in October and are hopeful that he and Representative Soletski will object to these new rules.

Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy believe these rules directly threaten the health, safety, and financial well-being of countless rural Wisconsin communities, as well as place a huge tax burden on all Wisconsin residents.

These rules will raise all utility customers' rates, making Wisconsin an even more difficult place to do businesses. These new rules directly contradict the stand taken, and recommendations made, by following organizations:

* The Wisconsin Towns Association
* The Brown County Public Health Department
* The Brown County Land Conservation Department
* The Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association

As well as numerous town ordinances across the state that protect residents' health and safety.

Worst of all, the PSC wholeheartedly ignored the voice of nearly all the citizens that spoke at the Wisconsin Senate public hearing in October, and the countless residents that submitted public comments at the PSC website. This is governing by and for special interests at the expense of Wisconsin families and taxpayers.

Media Contact:
Steve Deslauriers
BCCRWE
PO Box 703
Denmark 54208
Phone: 920-785-1837

LETTER FROM SENATOR JON ERPENBACH TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

REGARDING WIND SITING RULES

SOURCE: PSC DOCKET # 1-AC-231

November 30, 2010

Public Service Commission

Eric Callisto , Chairperson

Mark Meyer, Commissioner

Lauren Azar, Commissioner

PO Box 7854

Madison WI 53707-7854

Dear Commissioners Callisto, Meyer and Azar:

I am writing to today regarding Clearinghouse Rule # 10-057 – PSC Wind Siting Rules proposed Chapter 128.  Having voted for the rule’s return to the PSC with the majority of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail, I wanted to share some perspective as to why.

In the committee hearing that was held on October 13, 2010, we received a number of suggestions regarding the rules that resonated with committee members.  I am including copies of that testimony for your consideration and will summarily list them in outline fashion for your use.

  1. Wisconsin Towns Association Memo
    1. Setback of large wind turbines from nonparticipating residences – at a minimum having the setback from the property line of a nonparticipating property, not the residence.
    2. Decrease the maximum noise limits from 50 dBA during daytime and 45 dBA during nighttime hours.
    3. Eliminate the authority of PSC to approve lesser standards than the minimum standards to protect the public under PSC 128.02 (4) Individual Consideration
    4. Increase the 25% limit that a local government is allowed to require a large wind turbine  owner to compensate the owner of a nonparticipating residence.  PSC 128.33 (3) Monetary Compensation.
    5. Require the owner of the wind turbine to reimburse the emergency personnel who train them in safety and emergency procedures.  PSC 128.14 (4) (e) under Emergency Procedures
    6. Change of ownership should not be valid until the new owner has shown proof of compliance with all specific requirements of the original owner.
  1. Wisconsin Realtor Association
    1. Setback
    2. Attorney review of contracts
    3. Informational brochure for property owners
    4. Clarification that lease negotiators must have a WI Real Estate License
    5. Additional health impact research
    6. Time period for addressing complaints
    7. Define the term “affected” in “affected nonparticipating residence”
  1. DATCP 

     Incorporate the use of DATCP guidelines that intend to maintain the productivity of the farmland associated with wind energy projects.

  1. Midwest Food Processors Association, Inc.  & WI Potato & Vegetable Growers Assoc. Inc.

Address the concerns regarding aerial application of farmland and compensation for conflict that arises.

  1. The concerns raised by countless individuals that the health concerns or wind turbines are not being addressed adequately, that the setbacks need revision, that the “takings” issue needs to be addressed, that dBA levels need to be reduced both day and night, that shadow flicker must be addressed in the rule, that the health aspects of Wind Turbines have to be studied and taken into consideration.   I have not included the reams of paper that was shared with the committee by all of these individuals – I know much of it has already been shared with the PSC.

In closing, I think the above outline gives the Commission a number of particular issues to re-examine within the rule. 

I would be happy to discuss further the return of the rule by the Senate Committee with the Commission.

Sincerely,

JON ERPENBACH

State Senator

27th District

JE.tk

REPLY FROM ERIC CALLISTO, CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

December 3, 2010

Dear Senator Erpenbach,

Thank you for sharing your concerns and comments regarding the wind siting rules. We appreciate the summary you provided us and will take all comments into consideration when deciding upon modifications that the Commission plans to take up at an open commission meeting soon.

Eric Callisto
Chairperson

NOTE FROM THE BPWI RESEARCH NERD:

Why won't Public Service Commission Chairman Eric Callisto tell Senator Erpenbach exactly when the open meeting regarding the wind siting rules will take place?

Certainly Chairman Callisto knows exactly when this meeting will happen. Why give such a vague reply to a state senator?

For those of us watching this issue, it's important to note that Better Plan has been told that the calendar of events on the PSC website is not an official posting place for such meetings so the PSC website calendar is exempt from the 24 hour notice prior to a public meeting that is required by law.

Better Plan has been unable to find the official posting place for the meetings apart from the entry way of the PSC building in Madison.

For many of us, a daily drive to Madison to check the posting at the PSC isn't possible.

Better Plan is concerned that the PSC is purposefully being vague about the date and time of this meeting and urges you to call the PSC daily to find out when this meeting will take place and ask for an agenda.

Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
610 North Whitney Way. P.O. Box 7854
Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7854
Phone:(608)266-5481
General Toll Free:(888)816-3831
TTY:(608)267-1479
Fax:(608)266-3957
URL:http://psc.wi.gov/

LETTER FROM SENATOR JON ERPENBACH TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

REGARDING WIND SITING RULES

SOURCE: PSC DOCKET # 1-AC-231

November 30, 2010

Public Service Commission

Eric Callisto , Chairperson

Mark Meyer, Commissioner

Lauren Azar, Commissioner

PO Box 7854

Madison WI 53707-7854

Dear Commissioners Callisto, Meyer and Azar:

I am writing to today regarding Clearinghouse Rule # 10-057 – PSC Wind Siting Rules proposed Chapter 128.  Having voted for the rule’s return to the PSC with the majority of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail, I wanted to share some perspective as to why.

In the committee hearing that was held on October 13, 2010, we received a number of suggestions regarding the rules that resonated with committee members.  I am including copies of that testimony for your consideration and will summarily list them in outline fashion for your use.

  1. Wisconsin Towns Association Memo
    1. Setback of large wind turbines from nonparticipating residences – at a minimum having the setback from the property line of a nonparticipating property, not the residence.
    2. Decrease the maximum noise limits from 50 dBA during daytime and 45 dBA during nighttime hours.
    3. Eliminate the authority of PSC to approve lesser standards than the minimum standards to protect the public under PSC 128.02 (4) Individual Consideration
    4. Increase the 25% limit that a local government is allowed to require a large wind turbine  owner to compensate the owner of a nonparticipating residence.  PSC 128.33 (3) Monetary Compensation.
    5. Require the owner of the wind turbine to reimburse the emergency personnel who train them in safety and emergency procedures.  PSC 128.14 (4) (e) under Emergency Procedures
    6. Change of ownership should not be valid until the new owner has shown proof of compliance with all specific requirements of the original owner.
  1. Wisconsin Realtor Association
    1. Setback
    2. Attorney review of contracts
    3. Informational brochure for property owners
    4. Clarification that lease negotiators must have a WI Real Estate License
    5. Additional health impact research
    6. Time period for addressing complaints
    7. Define the term “affected” in “affected nonparticipating residence”
  1. DATCP 

     Incorporate the use of DATCP guidelines that intend to maintain the productivity of the farmland associated with wind energy projects.

  1. Midwest Food Processors Association, Inc.  & WI Potato & Vegetable Growers Assoc. Inc.

Address the concerns regarding aerial application of farmland and compensation for conflict that arises.

  1. The concerns raised by countless individuals that the health concerns or wind turbines are not being addressed adequately, that the setbacks need revision, that the “takings” issue needs to be addressed, that dBA levels need to be reduced both day and night, that shadow flicker must be addressed in the rule, that the health aspects of Wind Turbines have to be studied and taken into consideration.   I have not included the reams of paper that was shared with the committee by all of these individuals – I know much of it has already been shared with the PSC.

In closing, I think the above outline gives the Commission a number of particular issues to re-examine within the rule. 

I would be happy to discuss further the return of the rule by the Senate Committee with the Commission.

Sincerely,

JON ERPENBACH

State Senator

27th District

JE.tk

REPLY FROM ERIC CALLISTO, CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

December 3, 2010

Dear Senator Erpenbach,

Thank you for sharing your concerns and comments regarding the wind siting rules. We appreciate the summary you provided us and will take all comments into consideration when deciding upon modifications that the Commission plans to take up at an open commission meeting soon.

Eric Callisto
Chairperson

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend