8/19/08 How does a resident in a Fond du Lac county wind farm feel about losing access to the Flight for Life Helicopter? Let him tell you.
Dear Editor,
Flight for Life recently sent a notice to local law enforcement agencies and fire departments advising them that they will NOT land in areas where there are clusters of wind turbines due to the risks involved. These risks include the height of the turbines (400 feet with a wingspan of 270 feet) and vortices equal to the turbulence created by a 747 airplane.
As a taxpayer who lives on the edge of one of Fond du Lac County’s three wind turbine industrial slums, I have grave concerns concerning the health and safety of not only my neighbors and family, but of others who will at some point be involved in some type of accident requiring urgent care and transportation. Yes, we can still be served by an ambulance, but in many cases much more urgent transportation via Flight for Life is needed. In those cases, victims will now need to be transferred via ambulance to the helicopter, resulting in potentially deadly delays, unnecessary handling of a patient, and additional financial costs for the patient and their family.
I am not criticizing the decision made by Flight for Life, it was made for obvious reasons. However, our local government, the developers, and landowners hosting turbines have created a situation where the health and safety of their own families, their neighbors, and many others is at risk.
Curt Kindschuh
W6279 County Road F
Brownsville, WI 53006
A NOTE FROM THE BPRC RESEARCH NERD: Earlier this month, a member of our own community here in Rock County had to be evacuated by a med-flight helicopter to Madison. We are glad to report she is doing well. And we are grateful the med-flight helicopter could land where it was needed. If you are concerned about another one of the many negative impacts improper siting of wind turbines will have our our community, perhaps you too will take a few moments to write a letter to the editor of your local paper and let them know how you feel about this. Getting this information out will support our local officials in their decision to adopt an ordinance which places human health, safety and welfare over wind developer's profits.
Write a letter that is 250 words or less and send it to these papers. (It's OK to send the same letter to all of them)
Fond du Lac Reporter: mmentzer@fdlreporter.com
Beaver Dam Daily Citizen: dc-news@capitalnewspapers.com
The Janesville Gazette: click here
The Brodhead Independent Register: click here
The Evansville Review: The Evansville Review gildner@mail.eishome.com
Wisconsin State Journal: kcrary@madison.com
And while you're at it, why not send the letter to your legislators in Madison?
To find out who they are and how to contact them, click here click here
For a preview of tomorrow's posting, CLICK HERE
8/16/08 What do wind farms bring? When sited too close to homes, they bring misery and pit father against son, neighbor against neighbor, and the green reason isn't the environment, it's money.
THE WIND ISN'T FREE
This week, the story of the down side of industrial wind farms has gone national. As reported in Newsweek, the Washington Post and the New York Times: from a distance, a wind farm doesn't look so bad. But when you look closer, when you are forced to live inside of one, it's a different picture. This video was recently made by a resident of the town of Byron in Wisconsin's Fond du Lac county. It's a good picture of what happens when wind developers have their way and put turbines too close to our homes, all the time assuring us they won't cause us any trouble. There is a place for wind energy, but 1000 feet from our homes isn't it.
A bitter wind; Huge windmills on farmland disrupt tranquility, split town and families
John Yancey leans against his truck in a field outside his home, his face contorted in anger and pain.
"Listen," he says.
The rhythmic whoosh, whoosh, whoosh of wind turbines echoes through the air. Sleek and white, their long propeller blades rotate in formation, like some other-worldly dance of spindly-armed aliens swaying across the land.
Yancey knows the towers are pumping clean electricity into the grid, knows they have been largely embraced by his community
But Yancey hates them.
He hates the sight and he hates the sound. He can't stand the gigantic flickering shadows the blades cast at certain points in the day.
But what this brawny 48-year-old farmer's son hates most about the windmills is that his father signed a deal with the wind company to allow seven turbines on Yancey land.
Yancey lives with his wife and children on Yancey Road, on the edge of the Tug Hill plateau, about a kilometre from the old white farmhouse in which he and his seven siblings were raised.
Horses graze in a lower field. Amish buggies clatter down a nearby road. From the back porch are sweeping views of the distant Adirondacks.
But the view changed dramatically in 2006. Now Yancey Road is surrounded by windmills.
Yancey and some of his brothers begged Ed Yancey to leave the family land untouched. But the elder Yancey pointed to the money -- a minimum of $6,600 a year for every turbine. This is your legacy, he told them.
John Yancey doesn't care.
"I just want to be able to get a good night's sleep and to live in my home without these monstrosities hovering over me," he says.
For a long time he didn't speak to his father. He thought about leaving Yancey Road for good.
The Tug Hill plateau sits high above this village of about 4,000, a remote wilderness where steady winds whip down from Lake Ontario and winter snowfalls are the heaviest in the state.
For decades dairy farmers have wrested a living from the Tug -- accepting lives of wind-swept hardship with little prospect of much change.
Then, a few years ago, change roared onto Tug Hill. Overnight it seemed, caravans of trucks trundled onto the plateau and for a couple of years the village was ablaze with activity.
Today, 195 turbines soar above Tug Hill, 122 metres high, their 40-metre-long blades spinning at 14 revolutions per minute.
The $400-million Maple Ridge wind project, the largest in New York state, brought money and jobs and a wondrous sense of prosperity. But the windmills also came with a price -- and not just the visual impact.
"Is it worth destroying families, pitting neighbour against neighbour, father against son?" asks John Yancey, whose family has farmed Tug Hill for generations. "Is it worth destroying a whole way of life?"
Similar questions are being asked across the country as more small towns grapple with big money and big wind. For many, the changes are worth it. With rising oil and gas prices and growing concerns about global warming, wind is becoming an attractive alternative.
The Maple Ridge project produces enough electricity to power about 100,000 homes. Other wind projects are going up all over the state. T. Boone Pickens is talking about building a $10-billion wind project in the Texas panhandle. Everyone, it seems, is talking about wind.
Yancey understands its seduction. An electrician, he knows as much about the turbines as anyone. He helped build and install the ones on Tug Hill.
Turbines have their place, Yancey says, just not where people live.
And he accuses the wind company of preying on vulnerable old-timers like his father.
In the front room of the little house where he moved after retiring from farming, Ed Yancey, 92, says he doesn't feel preyed upon. He feels lucky.
"It's better than a nuclear plant," Ed Yancey says. "And it brings in good money."
Ben Byer, a 75-year-old retired dairy farmer, feels the same way.
"It sure beats milking cows," he says of the seven turbines on his land.
But Byer, who is John Yancey's uncle, understands the lingering resentments the windmills fuel between those who profit and those who don't. The wind company signed lease agreements with just 74 landowners and "good neighbour" agreements with several dozen more, offering $500 to $1,000 for the inconvenience of living close to the turbines.
Byer's 47-year-old son, Rick, lives higher up on the plateau in a small white house with a two-seat glider parked in a shed. The glider is Rick Byer's passion. He flies on weekends when he's not working at the pallet-making company.
In order to launch, the glider has to be towed by truck down a long rolling meadow across the road. When the wind company began negotiating with his father to put turbines on his "runway," Rick Byer delivered a furious ultimatum.
"I told him if he allowed turbines in that field he would lose a son."
The son's rage won out, but Rick Byer still seethes at the forest of turbines that sprouted across from his home. Now he speaks out in other area towns where windmills are proposed.
Like most of their neighbours, the Yanceys and Byers had a hard time believing the wind salesman when he first rolled into town in 1999.
"No one thought it would happen," John Yancey says.
At first local officials were skeptical too. But they listened, and learned, and they started hammering out agreements with the wind company, Atlantic Renewable Corp., and its partner, Zilka Renewable Energy. (The companies have changed names and ownership several times, and the Maple Ridge Wind project is now jointly owned by PPM Energy of Portland, Ore., which is part of the Spanish company Iberdrola SA, and Houston-based Horizon Wind Energy LLC, which is owned by the Portuguese conglomerate Energias de Portugal.)
Eventually officials from Lowville, Martinsburg and Harrisburg, along with Lewis County legislators, negotiated a 15-year payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreement that gave the three jurisdictions $8.1 million in the first year.
Martinsburg, with a population of 1,249, got the biggest municipal cut because it hosts the largest number of windmills -- a total of 102. Martinsburg supervisor Terry Thiesse, who has a windmill on his land, says the municipal budget went from just under $400,000 to more than $1.2 million with the first wind payment in 2006.
The school district, which serves all jurisdictions, received $2.8 million in 2006 and $3.5 million in 2007.
Wind finances are a source of great confusion for many locals, who assumed they would get free electricity once the turbines were installed. In fact, the energy is sold to utility companies and piped into the grid.
Though the wind itself is free, companies have enormous startup costs: a single industrial wind turbine costs about $3 million. In New York, companies benefit from the fact that the state requires 25 per cent of all electricity to be supplied from renewable sources by 2013. They also get federal production tax credits in addition to "green" renewable energy credits, which can be sold in the energy market.
In this context, the annual payments of about $6,600 per turbine are relatively small. But for some cash-strapped farmers, they're a big help.
"It's the best cash cow we ever had," booms retired dairy farmer Bill Burke, who has six turbines on his land. Burke, 60, is a school board member and county legislator, who also works part-time for the wind company.
Burke sold the last of his herd in 2004. Without the income from the turbines, he says, he might have had to sell his 100-year-old farm, too. He has no regrets about grabbing his "once in a lifetime chance at prosperity."
Not everyone agrees.
For many, the realities of living with windmills are more complicated than clean energy and easy money. People have mixed feelings about the enormous scale of the project. They question what will happen when the 15-year agreements expire. There are concerns about the impact of turbines on bird and bat populations. Some accuse lawmakers of getting too cosy with wind developers -- allegations that prompted New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to launch an investigation into two wind companies and their dealings with upstate municipalities. (The investigation does not involve Maple Ridge.)
Such concerns have prompted some towns to pass moratoria on industrial turbines in order to learn more. Malone and Brandon recently banned them completely.
"It seemed like the cost, in terms of how it changed the community, was too high," Malone supervisor Howard Maneely said after visiting Lowville.
On Nefsey Road, which runs parallel to Yancey Road, Dawn Swenedoski, a sixth-grade teacher, finds a certain beauty in the windmills.
But she is sympathetic to her neighbours' concerns. The Amish farmer across the road hates how the towers have disrupted the sense of tranquility that lured his family from Maryland in the first place. And Swenedoski, who sees the windmills only in the distance, understands John Yancey's annoyance at living with them up close.
"It's hard when change is for the common good, but some people suffer more than others," she says.
No one understands that better than the Yanceys, struggling to patch fractured family relationships, even as they struggle to come to terms with the turbines.
High on Tug Hill sits the Flat Rock Inn, a popular gathering point for snowmobilers and all-terrain vehicle riders. Twenty years ago, Gordon Yancey carved out this chunk of land with the help of his father, creating kilometres of forest trails and camping areas, set around a 2.5-hectare pond and a small rustic inn and bar.
All around stretch windmills, kilometres and kilometres of them. Yancey chokes up just looking at them.
"Dad taught us such respect for the land. For my father to be part of this . . ." His voice trails off and he shakes his head and walks away.
This particular weekend is a busy one for Yancey's inn, which is hosting a huge watercross event -- in which snowmobiles roar across the pond, their speed keeping them from sinking. People come from all over to race their machines across the pond. Campers roll in to watch. There are campfires and barbecues, screaming engines and squealing children.
In the distance, Rick Byer's glider floats above the turbines. On the ground, Gordon Yancey bellows race results through a loudspeaker. Patriarch Ed Yancey talks about the old days -- before snowmobiles and turbines. John Yancey works an enormous gas grill turning 50 sizzling chickens on spits.
All around the windmills spin. John Yancey looks up from the grill occasionally and grimaces. Right now, no one else seems to care.
8/15/08 Can the state force us to give up our Flight of Life access in order to site a wind farm in our community?
One of the things communities like ours will be asked to give up when a wind farm comes is rescue and transport by Flight for Life helicopters who will not fly into areas of wind farms.
Wind developers EcoEnergy have proposed to site 67 wind turbines in the town of Magnolia's 36 square miles. They won't tell us where they will be or how they will be clustered.
They don't seem to care that the township has passed an ordinance which gives our homes a safe setback of half a mile. They've said they'll just go to the Public Service Commission and get them to approve the project.
And they certainly don't seem to care that their project will mean Flight for Life helicopters will no longer be able to land parts of Magnolia township. Why should they care? They don't live here. None of their families live here.
But what about those of us who do live here?
What happens if the state passes legislation that will force Wisconsin Communities to accept 40 story industrial turbines 1000 feet from our doors and force members of our community to give up access to Flight For Life?
Five minutes of your time will make all the difference.
8/14/08 How much does local control over siting of wind turbines mean to you? Is this issue worth five minutes of your time? YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT?
If your township doesn't already have an ordinance in place with a safer setback, now is the time to contact your town board to ask them act on it. Ordinances with safer setbacks can be downloaded by clicking here And now is the time to contact your legislators to let them know maintaining local control on this issue is something you feel strongly about. It will take you about five minutes to send them an email. The wind turbines will be here for 30 years.
To find out who your legislators are and how to contact them, click here
Read this article from Milwaukee's Daily Reporter to know how serious this issue is--
State swings for wind rules Municipalities fight for local control Daily Reporter (click here to read at source) |
|
|
|
The
state Legislature will try again to establish statewide wind farm
standards, but the one-size-fits-all approach faces the same opposition. Since the last legislative session ended with a failed attempt to approve standards, several local governments created wind farm ordinances, and many argue that’s where the discussion should stay. “It’s a scary prospect to put (turbines) in here among all the homes,” said Mike Luethe, chairman of the town of Ridgeville, which last week joined the town of Wilton in passing an ordinance establishing half-mile setbacks for wind farms. “Local governments should still have a say in the matter.” He said Invenergy LLC of Chicago, which wants to develop a wind farm in the area, already challenged in court the joint Ridgeville-Wilton ordinance. “They said we didn’t have the right to pass our own ordinance,” Luethe said, “because it essentially vetoed the county’s own ordinance.” It’s that kind of confusion at lower government levels that prompts state officials to take action. “Look, I realize it’s an extremely sensitive situation,” said state Rep. Phil Montgomery, the Green Bay Republican who co-authored a bill last year for statewide standards. “But as the chairman of the (Assembly) Committee on Energy and Utilities, I have a responsibility to meet state criteria and have statewide policies in place.” Kevin Brady, clerk of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities and Rail, which dealt with the unsuccessful Senate version of the wind farm bill last session, said towns and municipalities need guidance in creating rules. “You can’t reinvent the wheel over and over,” he said. “We need a statewide policy or nobody’s going to want to come develop wind farms here.” That’s OK with some people. Gerry Meyer, a Brownsville resident, said his 13-year-old son suffers ill effects from the sound of turbines spinning three quarters of a mile away. “He says his head feels like it’s spinning 100 mph, not just from the sound but the shadows flickering on his walls,” Meyer said. “I’m just angry (state) officials have let it get to this point. Working in the garden used to be relaxing. “Frankly, I’d rather have a nuclear power plant three quarters of a mile away.” Montgomery said he respects the concerns of residents who live near wind farms, and he said he wants to balance their concerns with the state’s need to develop renewable energy sources. And if local governments get control of wind farm siting, Montgomery said, they’ll likely look for more. “If you do it for wind, then what?” he said. “I mean, if you want to see a train wreck and something that would just shut the state down economically, it’d be having to have developers and companies go through 3,000-plus governing bodies to get their projects done.” As long as wind farm developers propose projects producing less than 100 megawatts of electricity, local governments have the final word. If they produce more energy, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin makes the call. Eventually, the state might take control of approvals. But Luethe said if state officials draw up statewide standards, they need to show they have residents in mind. “This is new technology, and it sounds fantastic,” he said. “But you get these developers coming in, and they sit on the boards and committees drawing up the rules. “You have to ask, ‘Will it fit here?’ And you can’t just have people from the east side of the state deciding it for everyone.” |
|
8/13/08 Rock County Residents Report Back on their Visit to Fond Du Lac County Wind Farm
To see what the future could look like and sound like here in Rock County, you don't need a crystal ball. You just need to head north by north east about a hundred miles, to Byron, Wisconsin, in Fond du Lac county, where the Invenergy wind farm has been in operation since March 3rd. Residents of our area did just that and share their experience with us here.
The map below shows the locations of the 86 turbines that make up the wind farm. Each red dot represents a turbine that is forty stories tall and has a wing span wider than a 747. There is only one building in the state of Wisconsin that is taller than 40 stories and it's in Milwaukee.
The changes these machines have brought to those must live with them have been unbearable for many, Those who are getting money to host the turbines have an easier time putting up with the noise they make. For others, however, the change has been devastating. Though wind developers downplay the issue of noise it's the number one complaint for those who live inside of a wind farm. Since the turbines went on line in March of this year, for many families in Byron, their peaceful days and quiet nights are gone.
There may be a place for industrial machines of this size, but it is not 1000 feet from our homes and this is the reason Magnolia township adopted an ordinance which gives residents a safer setback of 2640 feet. (To download this ordiance, click here) There are those of us who believe even this isn't an adequate setback to protect our community, but it's better than the 1000 feet the developers want to force upon us. Unless your township has an ordinance this is just what they wil do. (To read a day-by-day noise log kept by a family living in this wind farm click here)We thank the Rock County residents who traveled up to Byron for sharing this report with us here. The photos below were taken during the winter during another Rock County resident's visit.
Visit to Byron Wisconsin to view existing Wind Turbine Facility.
Our trip to Byron was on June 6 and 7 of 2008
We came prepared with a sound meter provided by the Evansville Police Department and a camera.
Once past Horicon Marsh area, which has a 2 mile setback for the migratory birds, you could see Industrial Wind Turbines wherever you looked. There are 86 in the area.
We started with a turbine located on a hill off the main highway.
This was located approximately 1000 feet off the road. It was a fairly windy day and all the turbines in this area were turning. The meter registered between 58 and 68 DBA from the roadway.
While at this location, a local sheriff stopped and asked it we needed assistance. We said we were just gathering information for our Township on the turbines.
When asked what he thought about these, he stated he didn’t know anyone personally who had one but that they were definitely noisy.
After he left, the farmer who owned this particular turbine came by. He was very open when we asked him questions concerning the turbine placement and the noise they created. He was accustomed to loud noise as he ran his corn dryer for 3 weeks straight in the fall and that was close to his home. He also stated you had to stay away from them in the winter due to the falling ice. You can really feel it when the chunks land around the area..
He was willing to put up with the noise, he had a daughter just entering to college and the extra money will help out.
His biggest concern was the roads.
They were ripped up by all the heavy equipment and still hadn’t been fixed. He stated the town and the developer were arguing over who should fix then. There is a construction company in town, Michaels and he had hoped they would step up and do the repairs, but they wouldn’t do anything until they knew who would be footing the bill. This is another reason it is important to document the road conditions before the work begins and make it clear in the ordinance who will repair and in what timeframe it is to be completed.
Taking another road in the area we viewed a group of 3 turbines to the southwest of a home. The sound measurements here were between 58 and 64 DBA on June 6th. We stopped and spoke to the owners. They had attended all the informational meetings and still felt they were going to be too close to homes, but their township chose to ignore the concerns of the local residents. Shadow flicker was going to be a big concern in the winter months as the sun shifts and the shadow from these 3 turbines blanket this home. The flicker was currently only reaching their garden space but the sun was just about at its northern most axis. They were told at their meetings the size of the turbines would be smaller than what was ultimately installed
At the invitation of Gerry Meyer we visited his home. He lives at 6249 County Road Y, Brownsville WI 53006-1103 which is about ¾ of a mile East of South Byron. Turbine #4 is 1560 feet behind his house. Turbine #3a is about 500 feet mostly east and a little north of turbine #4. Turbine # 6 is about ¾ of a mile to the northwest of his home. Across the road mostly south and slightly west is turbine #73 and across the road at 2480 feet, down the hill to the west is turbine #74a which is about ¾ of a mile away. We could hear all of these turbines and the distance ranged from 1560 ft to ¾ of a mile. The sound was like driving down a highway with your windows down and passing another car, only you never get past them. The readings here were in a range of 59 to 67 DBA on June 6th and slightly lower on the 7th. 57 To 64 DBA.
Our draft ordinance suggested ½ mile as a starting point and this is too close for the health of local residents who would be living within this area to cope with 24/7 and 365 days a year for 30 years.
Stopping at the local convenience store we spoke to the cashiers. One woman said coming into the area at night was like coming into an airport with all the lights blinking. She stated the noise was much louder than the developers led the community to expect.
The young man, 16 years old, said he was just a kid and his opinion didn’t matter, but they made a lot of noise at night. His folks were not in favor of the short setbacks but again the township didn’t concern itself with protecting its residents.
We traveled many of the roads in the area on both days, stopping wherever it was possible to take measurements. In all, we took readings of around 36 different turbines.
The lowest measurement was 48 DBA and the highest 69 DBA
We observed the condition of the roads all through out the “wind facility” and they were in poor condition. The corners were rounded and filled with large rock. The roadways were cracked and rutted. Driveways leading into the fields were everywhere and not always at a straight shot to the turbine. Hill and valleys dictated they go at an angle for visibility and this took up large chucks of the fields.